Jump to content

Talk:Bounding interval hierarchy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christian75 (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 30 October 2013 ({{WikiProject Computer Science|class=|importance=}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputer science Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Flat tree structure

Re-added the flat tree structure property. Although BIH is a binary tree, they have a flatter tree structure than KD-trees. This is also mentioned by the author. It is for the same reason as with BVH: Simply primitives are never split by the splitting planes. (Also a threshold can be set to stop subdividing the BIH, resulting in even flatter trees.) I feel the flatter tree is relevant because it leads to smaller memory requirements & bandwidth (due decrease in nodes) and decreased branching. The author also mentions that this could benefit hardware implementations. (I assume this is because it would be easier to write a stackless implementation and also again due to decreased branching). If you feel this shouldn't be in please explain here ;). Errantkid 21:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General Notes

Shortened the description of non-axis aligned BIH. I feel it's a bit wordy for an overview. I think a description of numerical stability is important enough to warrant its own paragraph. I'll try to write one some time soon if I get some time (or someone else can if they want :P) Errantkid 20:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]