Jump to content

Talk:IBM Parallel Sysplex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Josve05a (talk | contribs) at 14:18, 28 October 2013 (clean up using AWB (9563)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Untitled

Why does it require z/OS R.8 for an ICF-only implementation to be viable? With CF Duplexing many installations I know run without external CFs. Martin Packer 20:22, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuilding CF structures

There were some improvements introduced in z/OS 1.8 for more efficient CF duplexing and rebuilding CF structures. That statement in the article makes sense to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBCWatcher (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I think the two articles can be combined into a more fleshed out single article. In my view, GDPS is a subset of Parallel Sysplex and therefore describing the two can be done in a single article. Both articles are fairly stubby. In looking at IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex to try and clean it up I thought it may be better to combine them. Any thoughts from others? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the IBM Sysplex article. Any thoughts on merging all three together? --TreyGeek (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have written up a combined version of the three articles (IBM Sysplex, IBM Parallel Sysplex, and IBM Geographically Dispersed Parallel Sysplex). It can be viewed in my sandbox: User:TreyGeek/sandbox. I would appreciate any comments or suggestions. If there are no arguments against the proposed merge, I will perform it next weekend (April 25/26). --TreyGeek (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:IBM_Parallel_Sysplex&oldid=579107622"