Jump to content

Talk:C POSIX library

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobot (talk | contribs) at 09:49, 28 October 2013 (Talk page general fixes using AWB (9563)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Copywrite violation

For anyone debating - here is the copywrite information on their table of contents. Fresheneesz 21:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. We can't use it, then. Do you want to rewrite the first paragraph? –EdC 21:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've reworded it in the temporary version. Does it look fine enough? Fresheneesz 05:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The second and third paragraphs are copvio as well. I'll use the first para; feel free to add non-copyvio stuff. –EdC 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temp version

I started a temporary version which adds info from another source, and changes some wording from the original source. Not all the wording is changed, however. . Fresheneesz 21:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Library vs. specification

"The C POSIX library is a language-independent library [...]"

Is it correct to speak of a library? This makes the C POSIX library sound like an actual implementation rather than a specification or standard from which implementations can be derived. Cf. with POSIX Threads. --Abdull (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same objection. Since no expert intervened since January 2010, I will take the risk of changing the text according to my own limited understanding. -- Nsda (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete list?

Can someone verify the completeness of the headers currently mentioned in the section C POSIX library header files? For example, is it correct that pthread.h is missing? --Abdull (talk) 22:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]