Jump to content

Talk:Agile software development/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 17:50, 21 October 2013 (Robot: Archiving 1 thread from Talk:Agile software development.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Testing in agile and waterfall

Nothing, in any development methodolgy, advocates testing after development. Developers are supposed to always test their work. About the only thing that agile does is make it obvious who is not testing their code earlier. Also, I know people like to think there is only agile and waterfall, but there are many other methods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_methodology All should be considered for every project as they each have unique attributes that solve problems in ways that fit the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.227.185 (talk) 03:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)



Mattford63 (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

This looks incorrect.

Simplicity- The art of maximizing the amount of work not done - is essential  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.129.150.234 (talk) 20:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 

Neutrality

This article reads very much like a sales pitch and has very little in the way of tangible information. 195.46.249.229 (talk) 08:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Can you be more specific? Can you specify what information is missing? Can you suggest sources for this information? Can you give examples of statements that are promotional in nature? --Boson (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The intention was not refer Global Systems Development?

Wikihug — Preceding unsigned comment added by T marques silva (talkcontribs) 21:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Need Proofreading

Please proofread this artical, you have some spelling mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.155.118.207 (talk) 8 July 2013

Could you be more specific? Are you, perhaps, referring to the non-US spelling analyse or to colocated, which is an alternative spelling of "co-located" (not collocated)? --Boson (talk) 19:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

I've undone revision 554926628, which seems to have been copy/pasted from http://www.versionone.com/Agile101/Agile-Software-Development-Benefits/. Its associated image appears to have been removed already, and I'm notifying the author of the revision via talk page. --Mount Flatten (talk) 21:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm with VersionOne and the use of the Agile Development Poster is approved as long as it links back to our site. The user, Rickard, made the poster blue and cited it as his own work. That needs to be removed, immediately. - VersionOne --Agilista (talk) 15:17, 20 August 2013 (UTC)