Jump to content

Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors/poll2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Austin Hair (talk | contribs) at 20:54, 9 September 2004 ((A) Yes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Introduction

This poll is to decide whether we should adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors. If adopted, the policy will not be set in stone and may change in the future in light of the community's experience with it. Please vote bearing this in mind.

Voting starts on midday, UTC, September 3, 2004

Poll closes midday UTC September 17, 2004

This poll will not change once voting has begun. Please make any poll modifications before 3 September.

Question 1

Should Wikipedia adopt Wikipedia:Dealing with disruptive or antisocial editors?

Please only vote one option. Votes for (a) will be added to (b) if neither (a) nor (b) receives a consensus.

(A) Yes

  1. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:41, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
  2. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (talk)]] 19:38, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  3. Jwrosenzweig 19:53, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  4. Austin Hair 20:54, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

(B) Yes, but only for a trial period of two months

  1. —No-One Jones m 18:45, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(c) No

  1. Gzornenplatz 17:54, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

Question 2

Please do not unilaterally add questions. Propose secondary questions on the talk pages and allow 48 hours of discussion to craft proposals. You will get a better outcome if you let others help you knock off any easily fixable sticking points first!