Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-Based Content
Appearance
- Web-Based Content (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:DICDEF, and not even a good one (title spelling, and not everything on the interwebs needs to be entertaining). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 19:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- DeleteIn agreement with the nominator's concerns. And Adoil Descended (talk) 20:01, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Yea hey I made the article, And While its true not everything has to be entertaining, But do't go calling a new wikipedians articles bad--Koy Hoffman (talk) 20:57, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect. Web content already exists. It's sufficiently realistic that a user might query "Web-Based Content". —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect. As what Largoplazo said, no need to delete as another article has an existing topic. ///EuroCarGT 01:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)