Jump to content

Talk:Rolling code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hagrinas (talk | contribs) at 21:11, 17 September 2013 (Rolling codes ALWAYS repeat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconAutomobiles Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rolling codes ALWAYS repeat

Any rolling code will repeat itself. The good ones have a repeat cycle in the billions or higher. So this article is incorrect. Rolling codes do repeat. Hcobb (talk) 06:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not correct. If there were a billion codes, and a user pressed the button once a day, it would take almost 3 million years before the code repeated. Even with 100 key presses a day, nobody would come close to getting to the point where things would repeat. If you assume a 20 year lifespan for an opener, then the person would have to use the opener almost 140,000 times a day. In that case, it won't last 20 years. It would be impossible to make a remote control with a lifespan of that many keypresses. So it would be theoretically impossible to get to the point where a code could repeat. You are basing your assumption on a remote control with a theoretical infinite lifespan and a garage door or car that will last equally long.Hagrinas (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo OTP?

Is this like a pseudo one time pad? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.233 (talk) 16:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]