Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Essjay (talk | contribs) at 08:00, 7 June 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.


If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark}}
The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).



The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

User created today and voted in two important polls. Actual votes make me wonder if this is a sockpuppet of someone. Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 23:49, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See above. This is quite likely a sockpuppet of banned user Zephram Stark (talk · contribs). Carbonite | Talk 02:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would agree. Similar anti-Carbonite, anti-Radiant! comments. Similar user page to other ZS socks. Similar viewpoints on WP heirarchy. I'd say this is definitely a valid case for CheckUser. --LV (Dark Mark) 14:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See comments on Zephram Stark, above. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.


If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Zephram Stark}}
The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).