Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimrod (programming language) (2nd nomination)

Nimrod (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Every source is WP:PRIMARY. Every one of them. Googling turned up posts to online discussion forums but nothing useful. Additionally, I note that the decision to delete at the previous AfD was unanimous for the same reasons. Msnicki (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article differs significantly from the one that was deleted in 2010, but provides no more evidence of notability than that one did, nor can I find any myself (e.g. I found nothing in Google scholar). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources. Only found primary sources and forum discussions on Google. SmackoVector (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete. Please do not. Not all sources are primary. Why are forum discussions not considered sufficient evidence? Furthermore, the Rust article also apparently lacks secondary sources yet it has not been nominated for deletion. dom96 (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]