Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimrod (programming language) (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
- Nimrod (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Every source is WP:PRIMARY. Every one of them. Googling turned up posts to online discussion forums but nothing useful. Additionally, I note that the decision to delete at the previous AfD was unanimous for the same reasons. Msnicki (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:37, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The article differs significantly from the one that was deleted in 2010, but provides no more evidence of notability than that one did, nor can I find any myself (e.g. I found nothing in Google scholar). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. No reliable sources. Only found primary sources and forum discussions on Google. SmackoVector (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- Do not delete. Please do not. Not all sources are primary. Why are forum discussions not considered sufficient evidence? dom96 (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2013 (UTC)