Talk:Tiny Core Linux

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tiny Core Linux article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linux Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion

I recreated article hoping that this time it won't be deleted for copyvio since I did not violate any copyrights this time. Please do not delete it or block it from recreation. Pmlinediter (talk) 16:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC) I am sorry if I did anything to harm Wikipedia or WPLinux. Pmlinediter (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny Core Linux Team

Is there any need to have the Tiny Core Linux Team section in the article. It doesn't add any useful information. DavidMarsh (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More info on licensing please!

"Various" is not good enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.76.117.4 (talk) 20:04, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added the license. OreoMadn3ss (talk) 04:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision

I'm planning on revising this article. The TCZ system has evolved qutie a bit since this article was written, and there is other useful information about TinyCore that isn't on the page. Also, the "Timeline" seems fairly useless. any objections to removing it? --Libertyernie2 (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content Removal

The sections "Team Tiny Core" and "Release History" do not add anything to the article, and as such I will delete them in a week if no objections are made. HMman (talk) 01:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Seeing no objections, I will go ahead. Instead of my original proposal, I'll do some major trimming to the "Release History" as opposed to outright deletion. HMman (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

CorePure64 and Fatdog64 - Yura87 (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

It appears (at least to me) that Fatdog64 has at least some traits of CP64 - notably, Puppy's standard "bulk-file" is stored within the core GZ, the TinyCore way. And the "save wizard" only occurs when shutdown/reboot is initiated out of GUI, else it shuts down without question, and its thorough shutdown/reboot preparation script is reminiscent of Tiny Core's (though it puts more effort into spinning down the physical hard drive/CDROM). So, Fatdog64 appears to be a blend of CorePure64 and Puppy, scrapping TinyCore's TCE tools but retaining the Puppy SFS loader tools. This is obvious even to a non-tech-savvy guy, and is also evidenced by double presence of Control Panel (both in System menu and in menu's root). Another thing potentially pointing at this is the ability to use a sub-folder instead of a save state (though this could be a new feature relying on both Puppy's and Tiny Core's existing features). This is something that may be of note to people comparing Linux distributions (such as tech bloggers).