Talk:Blocks (C language extension)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blocks (C language extension) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Computer science Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Apple Inc. Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
This page should not mention Grand Central Dispatch more than mentioning that it optionally uses blocks. The many GCD references only serve to further confuse the two. --Devnevyn (talk) 08:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Also, what does this mean?
Unlike closures in pure functional languages, blocks do not capture all of their surrounding state; they only capture copies of their surrounding stack variables.[5]
What state is NOT captured? Globals are captured by reference, and all locals are captured also by reference in a stack block, by copy for a non-__block variable in a heap block, and by owning reference in a __block variable in a heap block. Unless I'm missing something, the statement is wrong, so please elaborate. --Devnevyn (talk) 08:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I agree with both of these criticisms, I've removed the latter passage entirely and clarified the former. I've removed some non-sequiturs ("Blocks introduce a derived type into the language." Fabulous!) I also removed the misleading reference to C++ lambdas. C++ lambdas differ from blocks in far more than syntax. A comparison would be appropriate, but it must compare more than just the superficial. This article still needs a rewrite/expansion, but it's now more accurate and less misleading. -76.254.63.45 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Relation to GCC nested functions
The article should probably also describe the differences with GCC's Nested functions: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.4/gcc/Nested-Functions.html#Nested-Functions I went to look it up, thinking that they were the same, but then realized that nested functions, unlike closures, cannot be called after the containing scope has exited.
--Blaisorblade (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- I've integrated your text above into the article. Thanks! -- The Anome (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- 3 years later, I have to say this part adds nothing to the article. If you never thought that these concepts were the same then it is confusing why the nested functions are being brought up. I am not sure why one person's previous flawed understanding means everyone has to see it in the article. - 70.36.139.84 (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Relation to C++ Lambda functions in GCC and other mainstream compilers
Looks like the mainstream of compilers for C/C++ are about to make "Blocks" or "Lambda" functions part of the 4.5 of the GCC compiler.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/349899/what-c-compilers-are-supporting-lambda-already
Lambda is part of the C++0x (C++ language definition update) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x