Talk:Digital forensic process

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Enforcement Start‑class

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computer security: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Digital Forensics Process written is incomplete see published article for full explanation

“The application of computer science and investigative procedures for a legal purpose involving the analysis of digital evidence after proper search authority, chain of custody, validation with mathematics, use of validated tools, repeatability, reporting, and possible expert presentation.”

Given this definition, this scientific process contains the following eight steps:

- Search authority - Chain of custody - Imaging/hashing function - Validated tools - Analysis - Repeatability (Quality Assurance) - Reporting - Possible expert presentation

Source: http://www.forensicmag.com/node/128 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.62.57 (talk) 00:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

A recent edit was made by a person who appears to have a conflict of interest. I have reverted this change without prejudice for them being restored by an editor who does to have a real or apparent conflict of interest. I have also advertised this edit and revert and a related set of edits and reverts to WikiProject Computing. WikiProject Computer Security is a more logical choice but it's talk page was too quiet. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a lot like hockum to me; such processes would be torn apart in any decent court. I should really look back at these articles at some point. Thanks for catching this David! --Errant ^(chat!) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking throuhgh; the paper actually is useful for the literature review. However I'd prefer to see it journalled before using it directly. And as to the ADAM process, I think that needs other sources to make note of it, especially as a new process, before we can cover it as significant. --Errant ^(chat!) 14:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]