Jump to content

Talk:Booting process of Windows

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Matthiaspaul (talk | contribs) at 18:14, 18 June 2013 (Merge proposal: +a). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMicrosoft Windows: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Merge proposal

I recommend merging Windows Vista startup process into this article. There is no longer a need to have them separate. -- Dave Braunschweig (talk) 17:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Windows Vista startup process could be merged into Windows NT startup process, but not into the parent article Windows startup process, which discusses (and should continue to discuss) all versions of Windows, including the DOS-based ones. However, there is so much more that could be included into these articles that I would rather keep them separate. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]