Talk:Toad

TOAD is also a development software (that I know of but don't use so can't provide much insight...) - Texture 18:18, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Frog??

Why is Toad in the category Frog? Weird. What about putting it in amphibian? 20:29, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The League of Gentlemen (comedy)

I reverted to the previous version, because the text does not belong in a biological article, but is part of the plot the above mentioned comedy. The removed text was inserted at the appropriate place within the text of the comedy. JoJan 08:11, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Improvement Drive

Frog has been nominated to be improved by WP:IDRIVE. Help us improve it and support Frog with your vote on WP:IDRIVE. --Fenice 07:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Should we rename this article to "true toad", as toad is too broad a term, and is used on many species of frogs. The term "true toad" is also used at the beginning of the article. --liquidGhoul 15:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frog?

The article really should come right out and make it clear- is it or is it not a kind of frog? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 13:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. Read the latest subject in Talk:Frog. Read the section on taxonomy in Frog. If you would like that repeated in this article, fell free, it is a wiki... --liquidGhoul 14:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toad vs. Bufonidae

I understand this is a sensitive issue to some, but when I searched "Bufonidae," this article came up. I would suggest a "toad" article (such as this one) that refers to "toads" in a general sense (including "false toads," such as narrow-mouthed toads and fire-bellied toads), along with a SEPARATE article for the "true toads," i.e. Bufonidae.Pstevendactylus 01:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]