Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia doesn't use Allwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 12.218.76.10 (talk) at 03:56, 5 June 2013 ('rejected': new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconWikipedia essays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Good move indeed. Tony (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it necessary to have Wikipedia:Build the web, Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context, and this? This seems really redundant. Mr.Z-man 16:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was originally part of WP:BUILD, which is a guideline. I was in favor of removing the text altogether, because it is redundant with CONTEXT, which is a far stricter guideline than this, but that was objected to, so I moved it to its own page. BUILD is supposed to be in dynamic tension with CONTEXT, not with itself.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 20:09, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Shii (tock) 22:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'rejected'

Can we link 'rejected' in the main article to the discussion where Allwiki was proposed and rejected? Wikipedia tends to archive old discussions, right? -- 12.218.76.10 (talk) 03:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]