Talk:Series–parallel graph
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Series–parallel graph appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | Mathematics C‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
Removed: apparently false characterization of series-parallel graphs
The Properties section of the article contains a paragraph that previously read as follows:
- Every series-parallel graph has treewidth at most 2 and branchwidth at most 2. Indeed, a graph has treewidth at most 2 if and only if it has branchwidth at most 2, if and only if every biconnected component is a series-parallel graph.[1][2] The maximal series-parallel graphs, graphs to which no additional edges can be added without destroying their series-parallel structure, are exactly the 2-trees. Graphs of treewidth at most 2 have an explicit forbidden minor characterization, implying that a graph is series-parallel if and only if its biconnected components are linked in a path and it excludes the complete graph K4 as a minor.
But the last sentence, claiming that a graph is series-parallel if and only if its biconnected components are linked in a path and it excludes the complete graph K4 as a minor, is false, as the Wheatstone bridge graph shows:
This graph is connected, its biconnected components are linked in a path, and it does not contain K4 as a minor, but it is not a series-parallel graph.
Therefore, I have removed the last sentence of this paragraph. —Bkell (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- ^ Bodlaender, H. (1998). "A partial k-arboretum of graphs with bounded treewidth". Theoretical Computer Science. 209 (1–2): 1–45. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00228-4.
- ^ Hall, Rhiannon; Oxley, James; Semple, Charles; Whittle, Geoff (2002). "On matroids of branch-width three". Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B. 86 (1): 148–171. doi:10.1006/jctb.2002.2120.