Talk:Automated exception handling

Java Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Can any one find any citations that this really exists? I tried a google search but did not find anything to support that this thing really exists. Shabda 09:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a solid point. Nearly eight months later, the same search brings up only 1,930 pages. I think this article reads like advertising copy, personally. Foolingmachine (talk) 09:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not only did such automated exception handling exist, they existed as commercial products 35 years ago on IBM mainframes. They also handled a huge range of hardware and software exceptions (with restart from point of failure in most cases) including tight CPU loops, failed instructions and illicit supervisor/kernel calls. See IBM OLIVER (CICS interactive test/debug). The features were built into the generalized test/debug features of the product as "standard" and the software enjoyed an uninterrupted success for decades, employed by many large IBM customers.86.142.85.194 (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]