Talk:International Music Score Library Project

Libraries B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for deletion on April 8, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

~~So, why is this page going to be deleted?~~ OK, i found the deletion discussion. gaclbusiness 2007-04-09 12:14

Untitled

The following article may be of interest:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7074786.stm

--Leonard Vertighel 22:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, agknowledged that in the "External Links" section --Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EU server

In this edit, User:SummerWithMorons inserted "by anyone" into the phrase "be downloaded legally by anyone, even if they are under copyright in the US." and then added the Template:Clarifyme. This strikes me as odd, as there was no need for clarification before that insertion. If SummerWithMorons wants it to be clarified how copyright restrictions outside the EU are maintained when accessing the EU server, a look at the disclaimer there will do that. Similar disclaimers are part of the overall operation of IMSLP proper (see Rachmaninoff: The Bells), so there's no surprise there.

I suggest to revert that edit. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I removed it myself without seeing this discussion first. I agree that it is pretty much an unnecessary phrase; I don't really see what wasn't clear about the sentence to begin with. Cheers, KGill _{talk email} 23:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Officially recommended by MIT"

Removing the "official" from this statement since it implies an endorsement from the Institute as a whole (which it has not received) and not an inclusion in the list of great sites for music research. I love IMSLP and recommend it in each of the classes I teach there, but that doesn't constitute an official endorsement from the institute as a whole. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC) (Associate Professor of Music, MIT)[reply]