Talk:Solution architect

Computing Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems: Software engineering Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is within the field of Software engineering.

"Solutions" - Why the plural?

The reference talks about a Solution Architect, which is a term I'm happy and familar with, yet the article for some reason refers to a Solutions Architect.

Was it a conscious switch in writing this article, if so why? The article talks about Solution Architecture, why isn't this practised by a Solution Architect.

Eeeuk (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly it's pure semantics. Personally I prefer the plural, but the two are clearly interchangeable. Acrooney (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You wouldn't say Networks Architect or Buildings Architect even though they also work on many. I think where two terms are interchangable, the more commonly used version should be the standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skipjacker (talk • contribs) 22:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Legal ramifications of using the title of architect

Discussion at Talk:Enterprise_architect#Architect --Ronz (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]