Jump to content

Generalized Procrustes analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gareth Jones (talk | contribs) at 00:40, 25 May 2013 (move references inline and link to papers). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) is a method of statistical analysis that can be used to compare the shapes of objects, or the results of surveys, interviews, or panels. It was developed for analysing the results of free-choice profiling, a survey technique which allows respondents (such as sensory panelists) to describe a range of products in their own words or language. GPA is one way to make sense of free-choice profiling data;[1] other ways can be multiple factorial analysis,[2] or the STATIS method.[3]

Generalized Procrustes analysis estimates the scaling factor applied to respondent scale usage, thus it generates a weighting factor that is used to compensate for individual scale usage differences. Unlike measures such as a principal component analysis, since GPA uses individual level data, a measure of variance is utilized in the analysis.

The Procrustes distance provides a metric to minimize in order to superimpose a pair of shape instances annotated by landmark points. GPA applies the Procrustes analysis method to superimpose a population of shapes instead of only two shape instances.

The algorithm outline is the following:

  1. arbitrarily choose a reference shape (typically by selecting it among the available instances)
  2. superimpose all instances to current reference shape
  3. compute the mean shape of the current set of superimposed shapes
  4. if the Procrustes distance between the mean shape and the reference is above a threshold, set reference to mean shape and continue to step 2.

See also

References

  1. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1002/9780470277539, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1002/9780470277539 instead.
  2. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/0167-9473(94)90135-X, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/0167-9473(94)90135-X instead.
  3. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/0167-9473(94)90134-1, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/0167-9473(94)90134-1 instead.
  • I.L. Dryden and K.V. Mardia (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-95816-6.