Jump to content

Talk:Common barriers to problem solving

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crisco 1492 (talk | contribs) at 23:26, 21 May 2013 (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common barriers to problem solving closed as merge to Problem solving). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Former good article nomineeCommon barriers to problem solving was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
WikiProject iconPsychology NA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Common barriers to problem solving/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 10:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am quick-failing this nomination as:

  • the article reads like an essay rather than an encyclopaedia article
  • insufficient context is provided
  • the article needs to be wikified.
  • the article needs a thorough copy-edit. The first two sentences contain basic grammatical errors.
  • references are rather vague, citing a sentence to a 45 page article as with citation #1 is insufficient. I have access to this journal and can find nothing that specifically supports the statement.

Please read the good article criteria and perhaps consider working with the Psychology WikiProject to knock this into shape. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]