Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RtlCreateUserThread

RtlCreateUserThread

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was PROD but contributor removed the tag, API calls are not of themselves notable, and the article does not provide any indication this call is exceptional. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 19:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is part of the undocumented Windows NT kernel API, but I don't see how it merits an article. I can't even recommend a redirect to Architecture of Windows NT, it wouldn't make any sense. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 22:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - and as much as per nom is frowned upon, the nomination summarizes succincly the case for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTMANUAL. 1292simon (talk) 05:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real way that this random command can be developed into an article. It is not particularly significant and, as a computer command, has not received news coverage. Marechal Ney (talk) 21:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]