Talk:Pearson language tests

The article Pearson Test of English Academic was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 May 2013 with a consensus to merge the content into Pearson language tests. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Stub‑class

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notable, wide use, many sources on the international level. Added highbeam one from the beginning of its use. This is unquestionably notable for GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is notable and has enough sources to establish notability. The next deletion attempt, if necessary, should happen at AfD. - tucoxn\^talk 01:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the three other pages on the individual tests up for deletion after merging in much of the content. This will balance it out for now and since the Business unit is notable, its products 'the tests' should be covered here as usual. While it is a naming nightmare, this page is much better now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]