Jump to content

Talk:Comparison of server-side web frameworks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ruralcoder (talk | contribs) at 04:42, 29 April 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Java/JSF framework confusion

I think in the Java section the table listing Java frameworks does not accurately reflect reality. The confusion centers around JSF and is two-fold:

  • JSF itself is not a software product, but a specification for such a product. The license column therefor doesn't make a lot of sense and the version number is not exactly the same as the version number for the other listed frameworks. The two actual implementations (Oracle Mojarra and Apache MyFaces) have real licenses and version numbers more in line with other entries.
  • The table lists several entries that by themselves are not frameworks, but component libraries and/or extensions for JSF. This is in particularly true for the entry "icefaces".

I'm not entirely sure how to best resolve this. One option would be to add a sub-section of Java called "JSF" with entries like icefaces, richfaces, oracle adf, and implementations mojarra and myfaces.

Arjant (talk)

PHP Frameworks

Some discussion on the Web Server requiremenets for PHP frameworks would be very useful. For example, CakePHP seems to be most happy on Apache with mod_rewrite and very difficult to run on IIS. Most frustrating for folks who are stuck with a hosted IIS service. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.211.178 (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of content management frameworks has some PHP Frameworks that are not on this article's list. --AlastairIrvine (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Also regarding PHP Frameworks: Someone seems to be deleting PHP frameworks big style, although its different usernames it is always the same (wrong) reason on delete pages: "Did a search: found no books/only books of the developers and almost nothing else". This is wrong for at least: DooPHP, Lavarel, Kohana. Those all are quite good frameworks that should be in the list and already were in wikipedia once but have been removed. For me that looks quite a bit as if someone tries to eliminate competition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.235.114.9 (talk) 08:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is WebPy not included in the list?

webpy

Why HybridJava web framework in not included in the list?

HybridJava — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexSerov2 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony

Candidate for inclusion in open source PHP - http://symphony-cms.com/ --Thistledowne (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Symphony is a CMS. not a web application framework. Symfony is however already listed. Greenman (talk) 07:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haskell frameworks

This is the list of Haskell web frameworks. Three of them (Happstack, Snap, Yesod) have feature tables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan.kulynych (talk • contribs) 10:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

remove obscure frameworks?

Should the entries for ExtJs and Helma be removed? They don't have their own article. 62.1.246.84 (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Real Studio

Real Studio has offered a web framework for development of web based applications since 2011. Is this something that should be added here?

More info: http://www.realsoftware.com/web/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.111.212 (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_server-side_web_frameworks&oldid=552672141"