Talk:Architectural pattern

Computing: Software / CompSci Stub‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

References

the Amazon page lists the first author of "Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture" as Frank Buschmann (note spelling): should this be changed? --AlastairIrvine 17:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoke-hub distribution paradigm

Does this count as an architectural pattern? --RichardVeryard 08:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it can count as such, but it needs a definition with respect to computer programming with some extant examples of the implementation. Maybe some network engineers could provide that? If someone wanted to create a disambiguation of the page for such an article, it would probably pass muster as this surely must have been an approach to some network handling software (as well as other places) in the past, and perhaps still in the present. --Daydreamer302000 (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article is missing architecture patterns

Currently lacks Hierarchical model–view–controller (HMVC), Model–view–controller (MVC), Presentation-abstraction-control (PAC) and more  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.91.81 (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

5 layer architecture pattern

why is not mentioned? --200.83.2.4 (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)--200.83.2.4 (talk) 14:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture patterns list

Is there any reason to use two images instead of more readily editable table? SadovnikovSS (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. In fact, it looks like one of the images was deleted or something was wrong with it. Since nobody has objected to your suggestion after a month, I went ahead and replaced the images with a table. Archknight (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 09:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural pattern (computer science) → Architectural pattern — Unnecessary parenthetical disambiguation. This appears to be the common use of architectural pattern. The article about patterns in architecture is at Pattern (architecture) and can be linked with a hatnote. Pnm (talk) 00:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support, clear.--Kotniski (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Categories of architectural patterns

The German Wikipedia enlists four categories of architectural patterns. Adaptive systems, distributed systems, interactive systems, and mud-to-structure. Is it appropriate to add this information also to the English article, where a different categorisation has already been made? Sae1962 (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]