Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid-core computing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Listmeister (talk | contribs) at 18:11, 9 April 2013 (Hybrid-core computing: Keep or merge). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Hybrid-core computing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources for term, seems to be an advert. (Content seems already covered by heterogeneous computing, a marketing/proprietary fork of that article by a WP:SPA / WP:COI creator.)

I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
Convey Computer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

No independent source for company, advert. Widefox; talk 15:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (tc) 02:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge with Heterogeneous computing. Hybrid core technology is notable and will likely become important, but it's probably best to cover the topic in one article. As for Convey Computer, well there's at least one IEEE paper on the company's product[1] and it is mentioned in several others. Probably notable. Praemonitus (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or at least Merge The article needs more meat, more examples, and something about its downsides (it sounds to me like the implementation would create a lot of incompatibilities). But it seems to me to be a valid concept in computer science. Listmeister (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]