Talk:CE-HTML
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CE-HTML article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | CE-HTML received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Untitled
More clearer view needed ? Please read the article and discuss if you think it conveys the correct message, thanks ! Thrill59 (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's looking good! The references are particularly impressive. I have to say though that I don't understand much of it. It would be nice if the first paragraph gave a little more context and explained it in easier terms. Keep up the good work, Martin 20:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Added a great deal more information, and clarified some parts. Included an image to 'get the picture' early on - hope this does what it should do, Thrill59 (talk) 08:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/02 September 2008
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Old requests for peer review