Jump to content

Operation Web Tryp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Smartse (talk | contribs) at 12:37, 1 April 2013 (+ source for credit card info (hope this isn't citogenesis https://xkcd.com/978/ )). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Operation Web Tryp was a United States Drug Enforcement Administration operation that ended on July 21, 2004 with the arrests of 10 persons. Its purpose was to investigate web sites suspected of distribution of unscheduled, unregulated tryptamines and phenethylamines of questionable legality. This trade in "grey market" drugs, which were not explicitly illegal but potentially prosecutable as drug analogs, became known as the "research chemical" trade; a euphemism for the fact that the chemicals were being sold for industrial or academic research rather than human consumption.

Five websites were involved in Operation Web Tryp:

  • www.racresearch.com (RAC Research)
  • www.duncanlabproducts.com
  • www.pondman.nu
  • www.americanchemicalsupply.com
  • www.omegafinechemicals.com

One of these websites, pondman.nu, was allegedly taking in U.S. $20,000 per week and grossed $700,000 before being shut down. Another, racresearch.com, reportedly grossed $500,000 in 14 months.

The DEA claims that AMT sold by pondman.nu caused the April 2002 death of an 18-year-old man in upstate New York, and that 2C-T-7 and 2C-T-21[citation needed] sold by americanchemicalsupply.com caused the death of a 22-year-old Louisiana man. Fourteen other non-fatal overdose incidents requiring hospitalization were also cited by the DEA.

In December 2004, using credit card information provided by the DEA, British police arrested and charged over 20 UK residents who had purchased substances through the seized web sites (Operation Ismene).[1][2] A few people managed to get non custodial sentences though one person is known to have spent 3 years in UK prison.[citation needed]

Legality

Although these chemicals were not yet scheduled, a long shadow was cast on their legality by the 1986 Federal Analog Act. This Act and the United States v. Forbes Colorado federal district court case stipulated that the burden of proof, in regards for the intention for human consumption, was on the government if any prosecution under the Federal Analog Act was to occur. Additionally, legal ambiguities regarding the legality of certain analogs of scheduled substances had been established in the aforementioned court case (In particular, the similarities of AET and DMT were debated).

See also

  1. ^ Mike Power (2 May 2013). Drugs 2.0: The Web Revolution That's Changing How the World Gets High. Granta Publications. pp. 2010–. ISBN 978-1-84627-461-9. Retrieved 1 April 2013.
  2. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4111625.stm