Talk:Fault coverage
Two different topics in one page
Fault coverage and test coverage are not identical concepts.
Moreover, it is strange to have test coverage introduced as a subsection of fault coverage given that it is more general and more popular than fault coverage (Google: 915 000 entries for "test coverage" vs 355 000 entries for "fault coverage"). Logically, the two pages should be permuted: test coverage should be the main one and fault coverage should redirect to it.