Jump to content

Talk:Encoding/decoding model of communication

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WQUlrich (talk | contribs) at 19:19, 2 March 2013 (WQUlrich moved page Talk:Encoding/Decoding model of communication to Talk:Hall's Theory of encoding and decoding: match title with actual subject of article.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

References:

1- Hall, Stuart. "Encoding/Decoding." Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79. London: Hutchinson, 1980. 51-63. Print.

2- Kelly, Aidan, Katrina Lawlor, and Stephanie O'Donohoe. "Chapter 8- Encoding Advertisements: The Creative Perspective." The Advertising and Consumer Culture Reader. By Joseph Turow and Matthew P. McAllister. New York: Routledge, 2009. 133-49. Print.

3- Dines, Gail, and Jean McMahon Humez. Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Critical Reader. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2011. Print.

4- Chandler, Daniel. "Semiotics for Beginners." Encoding/Decoding. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2013. Tang.ca (talk) 03:52, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Does this warrant it's own article? Why can't Hall's discussion of reception theory and his coding/encoding be either on the reception theory page or on the Hall page? It's unclear why it would be spread across three pages. If the reader wants to get a good understanding of his stance, they have to click all over the place. Can this page be deleted and the information merged with the "reception theory" page, where Hall can be accorded fair space? Thanks. --TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 02:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but I think it's worth it's own page so long as the theory is properly defined, so I updated page with another source and added more content. -- Nathanaelbassett 11:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]