Talk:Java code coverage tools

notable because:

• more mature, and popular than cobertura, or clover for Eclipse (software):
  • http://marketplace.eclipse.org/node/264#.USyI28W_Ppt
  • http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/ecobertura#.USyI2MW_Pps
  • http://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/atlassian-clover-eclipse#.USyJwsW_Pps
• replaced emma in eclipse EclEmma plugin
• replaced cobertura as default coverage tool for sonar
• 700+ installs / month for jenkins, strong growth: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JaCoCo+Plugin

--ThurnerRupert (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

None of those reasons count towards WP:NSOFT. I've nominated the article for deletion via AfD. Jarkeld (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

you want to nominate the other tools as well, like emma, clover, and cobertura? or you are happy with the notability? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Haven't looked at them yet, perhaps in the near future. Jarkeld (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

it stands out of the crowd in two aspects. only bytecode one (amongst cobertura, emma) supporting java 7 and up. only one supporting online instrumentation and collection and merge of the results (amongst cobertura, emma, clover). --ThurnerRupert (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

As per recommendation on WP:NSOFT - simple search of "EclEmma" on Google books will give a lot of books, which mention EclEmma and thus JaCoCo. Such well known books as "Java Power Tools" doesn't count as well? Mandrikov (talk) 01:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)