Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Those Aren't Muskets!

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Malcolmxl5 (talk | contribs) at 17:10, 28 February 2013 (Adding {{unsigned2}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Those Aren't Muskets!

Those Aren't Muskets! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comedy group, doesn't pass WP:ORG - BigPimpinBrah (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep
    • They are notable. Does pass WP:ORG. Notable links have been provided, and are continually provided. Comedy group consists of notable comedy writers as well as guest-actors who are from noted television programs. annacatt (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
      • Comment The article has one reliable source at most (I do not know anything about tubefilter so I can't judge whether it is reliable). The group has not received significant press coverage to justify an article. Edit: as more sources have been added. My WP:ORG referral still stands, "Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability" - BigPimpinBrah (talk) 02:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • comment I respectfully disagree. There are more and more sources being added. They have created films as well as web-series. There are plenty of articles that mark their notability, as well as the fact that many notable actors and comedy writers belong to this group. annacatt (talk) 03:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete, found one article behind a pay wall where the subject of the article is the primary subject of a non-primary reliable source, and in that source contains significant coverage of the subject of this AfD. However, one article I don't think is enough, as usually multiple reliable sources are required to indicate notability. Therefore, per WP:GNG I have to lean towards deletion. If others can find other reliable sources with significant coverage of the subject, I maybe persuaded to change my mind.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete I was able to read the article you found, RCLC, and it is indeed a full-length article about this troupe, amounting to significant coverage from an independent reliable source. I used it to add information to the article. Unfortunately I couldn't find any other significant independent coverage, and one such reference is not enough. Maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON. Perhaps the article could be wikified to the author, for expansion if their notability grows. --MelanieN (talk) 03:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - generally for music groups, if there is two or more notable members it would be sufficient. In this case, there are two members notable and with existing WP articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiggerjay (talk • contribs) 20:44, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Those_Aren%27t_Muskets!&oldid=541286976"