Talk:Projection mapping

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Projection mapping article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Unassessed

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Projection mapping be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

vjing

The opportunity to expand on this new changing format on vjing and vj cultures. --Nonintia (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The vjing page is a good reference to start, although I think Visual Mapping or Mapping is another genre altogether.--Nonintia (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The existing vjing wiki will be too long to be expanded on for Visual Mapping Wiki page.--Nonintia (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Content

Discussion on the topic of mapping must be historically idealised and edited for better content to avoid deletion.--Nonintia (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

If there are no objections, I am going to change the name of this entry to "video mapping." This is much more commonly used both within the mapping world, and online. I almost even created a video mapping page because this was so hard to find. Rathergood15 (talk) 04:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

It has been proposed in this section that Projection mapping be renamed and moved to Projection Mapping.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Video mapping → Projection Mapping – The name of this technology has been up in the air for a while, but I feel like projection mapping is the most agreed upon name within the community.[1] The main reason for this rename is that I wrote this page only using knowledge gained by research. I am hoping that this rename will attract potential editors with actual experience with this technology. relisting see below Andrewa (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Rathergood15 (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it's not about other types of video mapping (used in post production) this is only about projection. But this isn't about the mathematics/computer graphics concepts of mapping and projection either... -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If this is a common noun it should not be capitalized. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting. Have we any reliable sources that indicate that this is even an encyclopedic topic, let alone what it is called? The three references currently provided [2] are all to websites. The first is to site promoting a software package, the second is a broken link, and the third is a blog.

I'm guessing from the tone of the article and comments that there's no problem worthy of AfD, but we do need to cite some better sources, both for the move and in the article itself. Andrewa (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]