Talk:Post open source

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this is an important development that has a significant bearing on the sharing of knowledge and code, and has the potential to destabilize existing neo-cultural artefacts including Wikipedia itself. This movement should be studied and the motivations understood so that the underlying issues can be addressed.

By deleting the article, you would be suppressing an early warning about an impending problem.

Yeah. But it still isn't notable. --LlamaAl (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found this Infoworld source which mentions "Post Open Source". That's enough to stop an A7, I think, while I look for some more. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]