Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mdd (talk | contribs) at 00:03, 18 January 2013 (Correction(s)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per this OTRS ticket, an executive with the FDIC is requesting that this article be deleted. Their nomination statement is as follows: "We would like to ask you to nominate the article for deletion on our behalf. The information is greatly out dated and some of the information was never correct. It is not just a matter of updating a few sentences - the entire entry is invalid.

Thank you, <redacted>"

Please note this request is being made as a courtesy, and the fact that it is made by an OTRS respondent should have no bearing on whether or not to delete the article. Tiptoety talk 04:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There have been earlier signals that some people are not satisfied with this article. In the past 2.5 years this article is (partly) blanked several times. Two years ago they already tried to make us believe the content is outdated [1], and last week they claimed: All information in this article is no longer relevant, the article should be deleted. [2]. Unfortunetally attempts to start a discussion [3], [4] about this have been unsuccessfull so far.
Now this article is created end 2008 largely by following two documents:
Now I suppose this is the case:
  1. In the mean time the FDIC has moved on, and probably considers these sources invalid. In their perspective the whole article is invalid.
  2. Now this article is created in 2008 to give an illustrative example of how an notable Enterprise Architecture Framework is constructed and under development. From an encyclopedic point of view this is still an interesting example, describing notable events of the new millennium
I admit there is one problem here, that the articles title suggesting the article is giving a description of the current state of the FDIC EA. An alternative solution here is rename the article to something like FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (1997-2012), FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (2002-08), or FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (2008).
-- Mdd (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]