Jump to content

File talk:Comparison convolution correlation.svg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Marioosz (talk | contribs) at 17:41, 17 January 2013 (opinion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

it seeems like the convolution example uses a different triangle shaped window from the top row to the lower rows... can anyone correct it?

The difference is intentional; in convolution, g(t) is horizontally flipped. That's what distinguishes it from cross-correlation. cmɢʟee 23:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The cross-correlation is incorrect. According to the definition in the article, it should be reversed, making it look exactly like the convolution (this is consistent with the statement in the Properties section that "If f is Hermitian, then "). It looks like this diagram was made using a different convention from that in the article. --TSchwenn (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IMO it would be more informative if some non-symmetric function (for example g function instead of square f) were used tu illustrate autocorrelation. Marioosz (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]