Jump to content

Talk:Development of Duke Nukem Forever/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Development of Duke Nukem Forever
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zanimum (talk | contribs) at 02:15, 11 January 2013 (→GA Review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a or will be replaced with a . Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.

GA-Class Criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Issues found

  • Most references seem reliable, but some need formatting with titles, author, etc. Additionally publishers should have correct titles and italics where necessary (for example, Game Informer, not GameInformer). Right now there are multiple iterations of publishers, some spelled one way, some another, some wikilinked, some externally linked (and should be), some not wikilinked. Publishers should also be wikilinked where possible.
  • What makes the following sources reliable?
  • So far prose looks pretty good. No quick spot-check issues.
  • Hooray!
  • Do those work?
  • Very astute.
  • Whole numbers under 10 should be spelled out as words, except when in lists, tables or infoboxes (WP:NUMERAL). I found one, but there may be others.
  • As far as my Edit > Find searches are showing, that was the only one.
  • Inline citations belong immediately after punctuation marks (WP:CITEFOOT). I know there's at least one in the Gearbox revival and release, 2010–2011 section

Reviewer: Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've completed the review. Please correct the following issues to have it pass GAN
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Development_of_Duke_Nukem_Forever/GA1&oldid=532473592"