Jump to content

Talk:Algebra of random variables

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aetheling (talk | contribs) at 07:16, 5 January 2013 (Article needs radical repair). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconStatistics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Needs radical repair

As of January 2012, this article is in urgent need of a complete rewrite. The article mixes exposition at several different levels of sophistication, and makes several serious blunders. This degree of confusion is unacceptable in a mathematical Wikipedia article. —Aetheling (talk) 07:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

von Neumann algebra

Shouldn't the *-algebra be a Von Neumann algebra to take into account infinite dimensional spaces?

Conditional expectation

Is there a similar axiomatization for conditional expectation? -- Spireguy (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One definition of the quantum (non-commutative) version of a conditional expectation is
"Let there be a quantum probability space (N,ρ) and a commutative von Neumann sub-algebra C ⊂ N. Then the quantum conditional expectation π( · ) is a map from C′ (the commutant of C) to C such that ρ (π(X)Z) = ρ (XZ) for all X ∈ C′, Z ∈ C."
So I'd hazard a guess that an appropriate algebraic definition for the (commutative) conditional expectation would be
"If N is the algebra of all random variables considered, and C is a (von Neumann) sub-algebra (relating to the measurement outcome), then the conditional expectation is a map P from N to C such that E[P(X)Z] = E[XZ] for all X in N and Z in C"
Thoughts? -- S.Wilson (talk) 10:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rules for variance

Could someone (who knows for sure) add the rules for variance on random variables. E.g.:

Var(c*X) = c*Var(x)

213.165.179.229 (talk) 18:50, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]