Wikipedia:Featured article review/Algorithm
Appearance
I feel that this article as it stands should not be a featured articles. It lacks references, is incoherently written and the history section is almost completely missing. —Ruud 23:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Remove - not well-written (incoherent structure, needless repetition of basic facts); not comprehensive (history section is a stub); completely unreferenced; appears to be factually inaccurate in places (although I can't verify that, since there are no references); lacks focus (several irrelevant digressions into programming topics). --Allan McInnes (talk) 23:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Have this issues been taken in the article talk page before nominating it for FARC? If not, remove/close this nomination. Joelito (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The todo-list has been there for a long time... these are not problems which are going to be fixed on short notice. —Ruud 01:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The to-do list does not mention any of the problems/issues you are concerned about. Joelito (talk) 01:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- It does. —Ruud 01:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The to-do list does not mention any of the problems/issues you are concerned about. Joelito (talk) 01:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- The todo-list has been there for a long time... these are not problems which are going to be fixed on short notice. —Ruud 01:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)