Jump to content

Talk:Progressive utilization theory/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Abhidevananda (talk | contribs) at 11:09, 29 November 2012 (Archive from 2007). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconPolitics NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article should be re-formatted to encylopedia -format. The five fundamental principles here do not need to be elaborated deeply. Rather the theory of prout should be discussed properly.--82.181.71.113 09:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. It reads like a manifesto rather than an objective account of the history and importance of this intellectual tradition in a wider context. kerim 08:13, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Major cleanup

I came upon this while looking at another olf AfD nomination. To my dismay, this article got radically worse since it muddled through its last AfD. It has besically turned into a big manifesto, not an encyclopedia article. I was about to re-nominate it again but instead I decided to strip out a ton of material that seemed to be either opinion, speculation, or advocacy. —dgiestc 16:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)