Talk:Dvorak technique/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Noleander (talk · contribs) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I can do this review. Can the nominator please reply and confirm that they are still interested in working on the article? --Noleander (talk) 15:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: must mention the "Level 1 to 5" hurricane intensity scale: compare and contrast with Dvorak
Lead: Must explain if hurricanes are included or not
Footnote in lead: Why is footnote #1 in the lead section? footnotes are optional there, and all material in lead is supposed to also be in the body (where the footnote should normally be placed).
No need to measure wind speed (fly aircraft into?) - I don't see a comparison of Dvorak vs other intensity schemes which require measuring wind speed. I would think that a HUGE point is that the DT is much simpler/cheaper/safer than flying a plane into a hurricane, etc. Maybe there could be an entire section in the article on "DT contrasted with other estimation approaches" or similar.
.... in progress ....

End comments from Noleander. --15:46, 21 November 2012 (UTC)