Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C++ grammar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Code-Analysis (talk | contribs) at 12:42, 2 November 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
C++ grammar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violation of NPOV and WP:NOT TheChampionMan1234 09:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Totally unconvincing WP:VAGUEWAVE by the nominator. Article is a legitimate content fork from C++ and can be easily cited to Stoustrup (or, for an alternative point of view, this) - well, maybe not all of it, but sufficient to keep the article. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear TheChampionMan1234, can you please, be more specific? WP:NPOV contains about 10 subsections; WP:NOT contains 16 clauses. What exactly is violated? In what part of my article do you see a biased point of view? I am ready to improve my article and more than willing to respond to constructive input. --User:Code-Analysis 12:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]