Jump to content

User talk:2.125.111.139

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) at 13:35, 26 October 2012 (Adding sockpuppetry block notice per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legalactionjackson). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lutalo Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS ACTUALLY DAVID BIDDULPH THAT IS VANDALISING LUTALO MUHAMMAD'S PAGE. HE HAS CHANGED THE INTIAL PAGE TO DISPARAGE HIM. HE NEEDS TO BE STOPPED. BLOCK HIM !

WHO IS DAVID BIDDULPH? A SAD VANDAL ON A TEAM GB HERO!

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Lutalo Muhammad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. SMS Talk 12:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked as a sockpuppet