Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NearlyFreeSpeech.NET
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) at 01:40, 6 October 2012 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:40, 6 October 2012 by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- NearlyFreeSpeech.NET (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article completely fails notability test, no sources other than self sources. Its an advertisement. Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't the article that should satisfy WP:GNG or WP:WEB; it's the article's subject. When you searched outside of Wikipedia for sources per WP:BEFORE, what did you find? postdlf (talk) 03:59, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There are no reliable sources that cover the subject. Tmtoulouse (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find anything either, if Postdlf has a reliable source, then please say what it is. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this article's references consist of a list of links to the organization's own web site. There are a few mentions of the company at other web sites which discuss web hosting, but those don't seem to be reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. So it seems to fail WP:CORP and WP:GNG. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 07:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG, all sources are self published (from the companies own website). Searching yields no unique results. meshach (talk) 19:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.