Jump to content

Talk:Atomic electron transition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 195.113.87.138 (talk) at 13:09, 2 October 2012 ("few nanoseconds or less"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Previous discussion while the article was still titled Quantum leap is now at Talk:Quantum leap.

WikiProject iconPhysics Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"few nanoseconds or less"

First, the timing depends on the energy gap value. Second, it is generally not correct to suggest a picture like

  • the "↑" state before T0
  • transition started at T0
  • intermediate state between T0 and T1
  • transition ended at T1
  • the "↓" state after T1.

In the Schrödinger picture, we will always see some superposed state with the ↑ amplitude gradually decreasing and ↓ amplitude increasing. More general, the moment of a transition is always uncertain, and speculation such as "transition started at… and ended at…" do not have a sense. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The moment (on the time scale) of a transition is uncertain (Poissonian statistics for a single atom/ion). Nevertheless the time for a transition (jump) is always shorter then statistical period of jumping cycle (interval between jumps) - obtained from density matrix ("superposition"). You can see (experimental - not speculation) it in wiki reference[1] (page 3). 195.113.87.138 (talk) 13:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]