Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signatures with efficient protocols

Signatures_with_efficient_protocols

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Signatures with efficient protocols

Signatures_with_efficient_protocols (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG's significant reliable source coverage requirement. Neither of the academics responsible for the research has a wikipedia article, and references are limited to the academics' own research. Did a search and didn't come up with anything saying otherwise. Batard0 (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 23:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. This appears to be more frequently called something like the Camenisch–Lysyanskaya signature scheme. Our article is in need of secondary sources rather than the primary source it gives, but there are plenty of them: this paper has 381 citations in Google scholar, and a search of Google books found around 1000 hits, the first few of them looking very relevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2012 (UTC)