Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cellular image processing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark Arsten (talk | contribs) at 19:24, 23 September 2012 (Relisting debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Cellular image processing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a collection of seemingly self-promotional articles related to Tao Yang (Wuxi). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Computational Cognition (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaotic digital CDMA and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physical linguistics (2nd nomination). —Ruud 10:48, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I think that the applications of cellular automata in image processing could be an encyclopedia-worthy topic (see e.g. the results of this search) but not under this name, and the current article is worthless as a starting point. I agree with the nominator that this is more about promoting Yang than about serving any encyclopedic purpose. Better to delete it and start fresh. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:05, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. (Marginal call). The design of machines for processing cellular automata is a valid topic for an article, although the current page is in need of an almost total rewrite. Although the article on cellular automata is comprehensive, there is a distinction to be made between the theory of cellular automata and the design of machines for processing them, which has a long history (e.g. work of Duff, Fountain et al. on the CLIP machines at UCL in the 1970s/80s). 86.7.23.104 (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]