Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Offline Storage Table

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uzma Gamal (talk | contribs) at 15:16, 20 September 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Offline Storage Table

Offline Storage Table (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be WP:OR. reddogsix (talk) 09:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(UTC)

It's not even close to unambiguous advertising. Most of the article has nothing to do with that website and is a factual description of a small (probably non-notable) feature of MS Windows. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, the article has changed since I !voted, including removing the advertising link and then removing the AfD notice against process. But now things like "Though you can set the many configurations for Take on life manually" make no sense. What's Take on life? I don't know. And if it's notable, where are the multiple, independent, reliable sources? --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • did basic cleanup Keep - I agree it was a terrible WP article as first published, but I took 10m or so and gave it a basic format, and now it's at least a poorly referenced article that needs cleanup, but a basic WP article. I don't see how this is any less valid that Portable Document Format (.pdf), which was an Adobe-proprietary file format from 1993-2008. .ost is proprietary MS, sure, but it's a file format known throughout much of the world. I'm not sure of the best way to reference it (not a computer guy), but it certainly seems Notable. I also don't see how this was "unambiguous advertising" even in the beginning, though it certainly ran afoul of WP:NOTHOWTO. Do folks think it's worth developing now that I've cleaned it up? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 12:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting comment. Relisting as the article has been cleaned up and the speedy delete !votes no longer apply. I would also like to hear more about whether sources exist about this file format that might show it passes WP:GNG. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 13:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I didn't find any reliable source information on "Offline Storage Table". Loooking at OST + Microsoft + Prospect (e.g., Microsoft company Prospect, I didn't find anythng. I looked for "OST data file", and found "Provide to OST data files and images of remittance received each day in a structure and format compatible with OST systems and BIA specifications."FedBizOpps May 15, 2009. From that, I looked at OST systems, which brought many hits for Open System Technologies as well as hits for out-of-school time (OST), Open Systems Thinking (OST), Operator System Transmission (OST), etc. I think it would be of value for Wikipedia to have an article on the Offline Storage Table topic, but without meeting even a lower end of the {{WP:GNG]] requirement of reliable source material, I don't see a Wikipedia basis for keeping the article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Offline_Storage_Table&oldid=513727016"