User talk:108.235.111.49

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.235.111.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edits are not vandalism. (Good Faith Edit Correction) [1] --108.235.111.49 (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were repeatedly warned to stop, but did not. I know that you saw the warnings, because you removed them from this talk page. Since you wouldn't stop when asked, this block was the only way to get you to stop. When your block expires, if you are confident that your desired edits meet Wikipedia's guidelines, discuss them on the article's talk page. While you are blocked, it might be useful to read some of the links at WP:WELCOME, to help you better understand how to edit happily and usefully. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You appear to hold a minority view on the question of the Governorship of Nevada, relating as I understand it to the inclusion of the Governor of the Territory in the total list. While the repeated corrections you are making are clearly not intended to damage the encyclopedia, by persistently going against concensus and ignoring multiple warnings your edits are by definition disruptive. Are you prepared to desist from making the edits for which you are blocked? (For the record I live in the UK and have only an academic interest in the matter.)--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of it at this time of the consensus and the user send the warning messages too late. --108.235.111.49 (talk) 21:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. You received four warnings and blanked the page containing them prior to your block. Please take note for future reference that blanking a page does not conceal it, either from an admin or ineed an ordinary editor.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

108.235.111.49 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

2nd chance request. --108.235.111.49 (talk) 22:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=2nd chance request. --[[Special:Contributions/108.235.111.49|108.235.111.49]] ([[User talk:108.235.111.49#top|talk]]) 22:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=2nd chance request. --[[Special:Contributions/108.235.111.49|108.235.111.49]] ([[User talk:108.235.111.49#top|talk]]) 22:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=2nd chance request. --[[Special:Contributions/108.235.111.49|108.235.111.49]] ([[User talk:108.235.111.49#top|talk]]) 22:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.